I've been asked to allocate my definition of the Sovereign of Wands.Without coat my private philosophy of the cards, I life-force precisely say that the definition is two-fold for every card. I get pleasure from a widespread definition I use for somebody I read for and a meticulous one for me. The widespread one is, not to manual labor the headland, hazy to macrosomic meaning. The private one is my microcosmic meaning. If I read for option and hit their microcosmic meanings, I'm having a good day. For the Sovereign of Wands my private definition is this:"Gush ended apathetic. Not slothful but power embedded. Like fire is not fire, power is not power, but the full nation for also making it manager power/fire than even the ace. It is pre-ace but manifested."Yes, this is suitably irregular and the pre-ace part sounds odd for inhabit that get pleasure from done some reading on the tarot but it won't for frequent that read my book.Edit: The pre-ace part life-force test odd even if you do read the book. I don't care. It works for me.
Reference: about-world-religions.blogspot.com